![]() |
![]() |
| Raw Video | Final Image |
I was having another look at some video sequences I took of Jupiter a year ago and thought it might be interesting to do a side-by-side comparison of the raw video and a finished image.
The raw video image on the left is pretty close to what was displayed on my netbook as the video was received from the telescope via the ZWO ASI 120 MC camera.
The image on the right consists of a stack of the best 507 video frames from the sequence of approximately 1500 frames. The individual frames were stacked, aligned, and sharpened (with wavelet processing) in Registax. Color saturation and levels were adjusted using GIMP.
I rate the seeing on this night as fair to poor, or 2.5 on the 5 point Peach scale. The Peach scale, devised by renowned planetary photographer Damian Peach, defines fair and poor seeing as follows:
3. Fair Seeing – Slight or moderate undulation or fuzziness. Reasonable contrast. Minor planetary details occasionally seen.
2. Poor – Very Poor seeing – Severe undulations or fuzziness. Poor contrast. Large scale detail poorly defined. Minor details invisible.
Based on Peach’s written descriptions and example videos, which you can see at his website, I peg the seeing for this imaging session somewhere between 2 (fair) and 3 (poor), or 2.5.
What do you think?
Details:
Date: 26 January 2014 03:13:51 UT
Location: Edmond, Oklahoma USA
Telescope: 203mm f/10 SCT (Celestron C8), 2x Barlow
Camera: ZWO ASI 120MC




